<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ten Rules of Biblical Interpretation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realchristianity.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ten-rules-of-biblical-interpretation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realchristianity.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ten-rules-of-biblical-interpretation/</link>
	<description>And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. (John 8:32)</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Higgins</title>
		<link>http://realchristianity.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ten-rules-of-biblical-interpretation/#comment-1344</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Higgins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realchristianity.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ten-rules-of-biblical-interpretation/#comment-1344</guid>
		<description>Yes I would</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I would</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://realchristianity.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ten-rules-of-biblical-interpretation/#comment-1340</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realchristianity.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ten-rules-of-biblical-interpretation/#comment-1340</guid>
		<description>What would you say, for a Christian, is the pillar and foundation or bulwark (defender) of the truth?
  
 the Bible ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would you say, for a Christian, is the pillar and foundation or bulwark (defender) of the truth?</p>
<p> the Bible ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Higgins</title>
		<link>http://realchristianity.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ten-rules-of-biblical-interpretation/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Higgins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realchristianity.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ten-rules-of-biblical-interpretation/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>You are right it is about 'sola scriptura' and no doubt I think that Catholics and the Eastern Orthodox would disagree. 

I believe that at the end of the day, there must be something that has the final authority and I believe that to be the bible. When we start making the bible fit into what WE want, that is where cults start and where unsound doctrine creeps in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right it is about &#8217;sola scriptura&#8217; and no doubt I think that Catholics and the Eastern Orthodox would disagree. </p>
<p>I believe that at the end of the day, there must be something that has the final authority and I believe that to be the bible. When we start making the bible fit into what WE want, that is where cults start and where unsound doctrine creeps in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah Tillman</title>
		<link>http://realchristianity.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ten-rules-of-biblical-interpretation/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah Tillman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realchristianity.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ten-rules-of-biblical-interpretation/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>These all appear to be excellent guidelines to me.

I do have a question about this one: "Theological presuppositions are bad, scripture determines doctrine, not the other way around."

Isn't that the "sola scriptura" doctrine of Luther and Protestantism? Wouldn't Catholics and the Eastern Orthodox disagree, at least in part?

(I personally really like the sola scriptura doctrine. But I think it's a doctrine nonetheless).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These all appear to be excellent guidelines to me.</p>
<p>I do have a question about this one: &#8220;Theological presuppositions are bad, scripture determines doctrine, not the other way around.&#8221;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that the &#8220;sola scriptura&#8221; doctrine of Luther and Protestantism? Wouldn&#8217;t Catholics and the Eastern Orthodox disagree, at least in part?</p>
<p>(I personally really like the sola scriptura doctrine. But I think it&#8217;s a doctrine nonetheless).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
